Parmesh Shahani: Dhiren, thanks a lot for having this dialog for the particular anniversary version of Homosexual Bombay.
Dhiren Borisa: Thanks for giving me this chance. On my approach right here, I used to be reminded about how I stumbled upon the guide Homosexual Bombay. As a shy small-town boy within the huge dangerous metropolis of Delhi, I had come to hunt a future and a refuge for my queerness – a phrase that I later learnt and am nonetheless studying. Among the many a number of parallelly laid bookshelves at a distant darkish finish of the JNU library the place I used to be finding out, my eyes sparkled on the sight of the phrase “homosexual” subsequent to a “metropolis” that I had by no means been to, however knew of, by way of Bollywood and trend – Bombay.
There have been a number of books with regards to queerness right here however not many who my closeted self might readily relate to. No one knew of my sexuality then, so I sneakily picked that guide up (I couldn’t dare subject it and proudly wander within the campus with that phrase too seen) and hid at another nook – a spot I’d later disguise and skim this guide. I had hidden it amongst different books which might prepare me to think about geography and locations specifically, and infrequently disciplining methods, and methods I’ve been since then making an attempt to undo, as to queer it.
It confirmed up in years later once I would do my doctoral analysis on the identical college on queerness and metropolis. Not Bombay however Delhi. Once I was exploring my sexuality within the 1990s and in my early 20s, I used to be launched to the Yahoo chat rooms, and the thrill and the implausible world that it allowed you to create. Your guide spoke of comparable worlds however of various instances and potentialities and of individuals, and I feel this dialog is attention-grabbing as a result of it takes us to a decade after that and within the course of many locations that we each might need inhabited, liked and despised.
P: Let’s speak concerning the prehistory of the queer Web. How did my guide affect your work?
D: It’s attention-grabbing as a result of queerness and know-how have such an thrilling relationship. And this guide explores it so superbly. There are such a lot of similarities between what you do, and I did in my work. The very methods through which we write as a result of we use the memoir.
We undo the rigidity of ethnography by saying, “I’m going to inform my story and you’ll have to take heed to it.” That itself is a second of delight and queerness. That’s how we queer the very thought of doing and writing about our lives. And that was very useful. Like Homosexual Bombay…a listing of this, after which for me to have my first interplay in Yahoo chat rooms and other people asking “asl” and I used to be like what’s “asl”.
P: Asl and “have place”. That’s the second query.
D: “Have place” nonetheless continues. (chuckles)
P: Sure, have place continues. Even on Grindr…
D: Sure! Certainly. Not in the same sense of a spot to imply the spatial risk of a sexcapade (as on Grindr on any of those apps), what’s attention-grabbing with Homosexual Bombay is that it’s Bombay. The place. That locatedness of it. Nevertheless it’s nonetheless not restricted to Bombay. It’s world.
P: I write about how all these locations come about due to a dialectic. I imply it’s Homosexual Bombay, it’s Indian queerness however how is it fashioned due to community of influences and potentialities. Homosexual Bombay constructed upon not simply the work of say a Bombay Dost or Humsafar Belief or primarily based on the dial-up Web of VSNL but in addition magazines like Trikone that got here out of San Francisco and South Asian queer networks just like the Khush listing.
For giant elements of time on the Homosexual Bombay and different lists, greater than half the folks have been diasporic queers, extra connected to the thought of Bombay as this imaginary homeland which they felt happier in than perhaps the bodily queer world they have been dwelling in whether or not London or San Francisco. I truly needed to finish this guide with you as a result of I actually look as much as you and your dissertation work which we hope goes to come back out quickly as a guide. Students like you might be in a way the legacy that I used to be hopefully making an attempt to create once I wrote Homosexual Bombay. Then there have been only a few queer books in Indian voices by way of academia. There was literature however there have been only a few tutorial works on queerness.
I’m truly very blissful to see how you will have taken this intersectionality of know-how and sexuality into a brand new course together with your work, I needed to ask you because you keep in mind the time of chat rooms: what you are feeling has modified and the way we think about and articulate queerness right now digitally since my instances. I actually really feel like a veteran and within the foreword of this guide I write how when Homosexual Bombay got here out first it was an ethnography and anthropology, and now it belongs to the historical past part. You are actually doing the queer anthropology right now so what do you suppose has modified since these days by way of how we specific ourselves on-line?
D: I feel so much has modified and nonetheless so much may be very comparable. Within the sense the very query of entry nonetheless stays, regardless of over time we all know new sorts of our bodies have entered these areas usually on contested phrases. Whenever you talked about how Homosexual Bombay got here up, you stated that the folks you have been writing about have been principally diaspora, individuals who have been in all places on the earth, had entry, had sources, might go wherever, principally males.
I write about my first time in my PhD, once I obtained to know somebody within the Yahoo chat room. They might inform me that they stayed in these cities that you simply communicate of, around the globe – Delhi, Bombay, London, San Francisco. On the identical time, I used to be in love with this boy who was wealthy, higher caste. This boy would inform me, “I might take you residence” as a result of you don’t look decrease caste. That I used to be meritorious, good and well-liked at school and spoke so eloquently – traits that sure privileged our bodies have been entitled to.
P: …and you continue to liked him?
D: Love is so flawed in that sense. We need what kills us. He was finding out in Delhi and I couldn’t even think about popping out of my hometown. He took me for the primary time to a cybercafé. This underground basement. He stated let me present you one thing.
He opened Yahoo messenger and pointed, “See, that is like Delhi Homosexual chat rooms and right here we are able to speak to random folks.” It was like some Rs 50-60 for half an hour and from the background I got here from, I didn’t have that luxurious. So I’d lower your expenses, go to the café however be very frightened of leaving a browser historical past.
Once I speak concerning the intersections of know-how and queerness, and lots of different social axes I battle with, that is what I imply – survival, of needs and selves. What the Web was permitting me to do was an try at undoing sure sorts of histories and recreating myself in
that. As a result of if I used to be there at that time of historical past in these areas, I used to be routinely assumed to be higher caste and higher class. Just like how my then lover thought he might take me residence as a result of I didn’t look decrease caste.
It was on this random chat room that anyone requested me, “what’s your PR id?” and I used to be like what the hell is that this? I assumed and stupidly in order that isn’t it “public relations”? Ready solely to be illuminated by somebody who would introduce me to this portal, PlanetRomeo. I used to be requested to “go there, make an account.”
That house itself, so fraught with nervousness, even if you wish to be there, belong there, you might be manufacturing a lot. You understand that you simply may not even meet that particular person you might be speaking to. Not like right now. As a result of not all people was saying the reality, in that not saying the “reality”, all people was saying the reality. A reality that would maintain fantasy of the self greater than the assigned identifications of the “regular” world.
At the moment there’s numerous dialog round what’s actual ID and what’s faux ID. Why aren’t you exhibiting your image and who will get to point out their footage? I really feel that earlier it was very stationary within the sense that the cybercafé was a really positioned place certain entity and also you needed to go there after which randomly chat with folks. The mobility that know-how has allowed you by way of smartphones which you can transfer round in all places has modified the very grammar of this interplay but in addition made queerness accessible as a really skinny archive.
We would not be bothered about location right now (just like the yesteryears of homosexual loneliness – to not say that we aren’t lonely anymore – I’d differ and say we’re all of the extra) however we nonetheless want place. The place will the act occur? The place is intercourse going to happen? The place are we going to fulfill?
Excerpted with permission from Homosexual Bombay: Globalization, Love and (Be)longing in Up to date India, Particular Anniversary Version, Parmesh Shahani, SAGE Choose.
– Vice President at Godrej Industries Ltd.
2020/ 344 pages / Book (Kindle Version): ₹435.00/ Paperback: ₹595.00 (9789353884208) / (Additionally accessible on KOBO and Google Play)